Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Revisions



detail from Kaleidoscope: Chinese Pipe and Glass
Before revision (left), and after (right)


Most of the last 2 weeks was spent paying attention to some family issues, and then getting over an ugly cold (I don't get sick all that often, but when I do...). Though it didn't leave much time for work, when I did sit down at my easel, I worked on revising an earlier painting. Revision is something I haven't done all that often, since I don't ordinarily keep works around for long after they're finished. This year, though, I made the decision to hold on to a number of pieces until the economy improves a little.

It was an interesting experience, so I thought I'd talk a little about it. This was a piece I'd finished about 3 months ago. I was completely satisfied with the composition, so I knew nothing about that would change. From the beginning, though, I was also a little dissatisfied with the quality of the color, and the general attention to detail. There wasn't any one thing that struck me as wrong; there was simply this overall feeling that "it could be better".

The entire process consisted of going over almost every piece of the painting, literally moving a square inch at a time, and simply restating brushstrokes. It's my impression that I spent a sizable fraction of the time reworking highlights; where originally I had painted a simple white, introducing a more subtle tint, paying greater attention to the "halo" effects around its edges, and giving more specific definition to it's shape. And so it went; the revision probably took at least half, maybe even more - of the time required to do the initial painting.

The results are anything but dramatic... anything. In fact, when I first made the side-by-side before and after detail shots (see above), I could barely pick out any specific differences, aside from it being overall a little lighter. My first thought was that I'd just wasted my time. The more I looked at it, though, the more I could see the results emerge. Here a highlight popped a little more, there a detail seemed fresher and crisper, and yet another color seemed deeper and richer. In short, the painting ultimately felt like it came to life.

It's just this sort of thing that makes the kind of painting I do worth it. Learning to concentrate more and more deeply this way is really the heart and soul of how I paint; and it's very much an ongoing process. The devil may be in the details, but so are the angels.

12 comments:

innisart said...

I can't pin-point it either, but the revised version looks great; it does have that extra something.

Constance McLennan said...

The revision is brighter, with cleaner colors. Very nice.

becky joy said...

I noticed the color difference right away, much cleaner and fresher. Looks great.

Kathy said...

The revisions you made to this painting really improved it. You brought life to the setting by adding light, which is engaging to the viewer. Now, it dances!

Pierre Raby said...

Great piece Jeff.
Totally agree with Kathy, it surely dances. Too much details may easily result in a flat amount of details. It surely helps sometimes to keep a good distance in order to keep back that fresh and spontaneous vision of the whole piece.

Dawn Chandler said...

Yes, this new one sparkles in a way the earlier version didn't quite.

Hmm....makes me think I ought to go revise a few of my own paintings.....!

Carolina said...

I can't imagine how hard it must have been to improve the original, but you did it. I think those 'most expensive' final details are the most important, ....not only in painting though....
Best regards,
Carolina

David Parker said...

Like you said, there wasn't anything wrong with it originally. But your revisions have definitely improved an already great painting. Looks great!

Rob Hazzard said...

Wow, what focus and patience you must have. I seldom get back to my "needs revisions" pile. Your work is really inspiring.

Lisa Daria said...

It's so helpful to see a bit of the process that goes into creating a finish - and the finish is divine!

Don Coker said...

Glad you're feeling better, Jeff. This is really a nice piece.

http://www.onpainting.wordpress.com said...

I would say it better as well but if one did not have anything to compare to, the original would have been totally acceptable.